» Follow me on Twitter

Almost as important as choosing the right telescope is choosing the right mount. A wobbly mount can ruin your beautiful night no matter how good your telescope can perform. The same goes with hard to operate mounts especially if you’re not that technically inclined. On the other hand, a good mount can augment your stargazing experience a lot even you have a not-so-good telescope.In this article, we will try to show you the pros and cons of some of the most popular telescope mounts. There are generally two types of mounts - the alt-azimuth mount and the equatorial mount. Both have their advantages and disadvantages depending on your observational needs as well as your technical skills.

Alt-Azimuth Mount

The Alt-Azimuth Mount

The Alt-Azimuth Mount or Alt-Az is simpler compared to the Equatorial mount. Basically it allows you to move your telescope on an up-down (Altitude), left-right (Azimuth) direction. An Alt-Az mount is easy to setup - you just basically put it on the ground and point your telescope to the object that you want to observe. It is also lightweight and the least expensive. If your target moves away from your field of view (FOV), all you need to do is adjust your telescope to point to it again in an up-down, left-right direction.

One famous Alt-Az mount is the Dobsonian mount. It’s famous because it’s simple to build thus making it an effective low-cost mount for casual observers. It also allows for easy setting up of large aperture scopes. I saw a friend who simply placed his 8-inch newtonian optical tube on top of his dobsonian mount and that’s it! I also saw a full 12-inch newtonian telescope operate relatively easy on a dobsonian mount.

Dobsonian Mount

The problem however with Alt-Az mounts is that it they don’t compensate with the earth’s rotation meaning you have to move it in two different axes most of the time just to keep your target within the FOV - especially if the object you’re viewing is far from the celestial equator. The farther your target is from the celestial equator, the more difficult it is to track it with an Alt-Az mount. This problem increases ten-fold if you’re viewing objects at high magnification.

German Equatorial Mount

The Equatorial Mount

On the other hand, we have the equatorial mount. It is bulky, complex, and heavy but all those negativities are washed out when you start observing - that is if you haven’t been clouded out yet considering the time you need to consume just to setup an equatorial mount.

An Equatorial (EQ) mount is positioned so that one axis is pointing to the celestial pole which is roughly the star Polaris in the northern hemisphere. This axis is called the Right Ascencion or R.A. axis. The other axis is called the Declination or Dec axis. The declination axis allows you to change the ‘height’ of the scope. To make it simpler, an EQ mount is simply an Alt-Az mount with it’s Azimuth axis pointing directly at one of the celestial poles. In this configuration, the setup will obviously be out of balance thus requiring it to have counterweights on the other side. The counterweight should at least be as heavy as the telescope thus doubling the weight of a scope with an EQ mount.

The beauty however of an EQ mount is that once you’ve aligned the R.A. axis to the celestial pole and you have found your object in the sky, all you need to move is the Declination axis as opposed to moving the Altitude and Azimuth axes in an Alt-Az mount. This makes an EQ mount relatively easy to operate when tracking objects at high magnification. When equipped with a small motor attached to it’s R.A. axis, the EQ mount becomes a perfect mount for astrophotography as it will continously put the object being tracked in the center of the the FOV as the motor counteracts the rotation of the Earth.

Popular EQ mounts are the German Equatorial mount and the Fork mount. The German Equatorial mounts are the ones you see with counterweights on it. Fork mounts don’t have counter-weights but usually have a heavy metal plate positioned off-centre to maintain the stability of the scope.

Note of interest on Fork Mounts:

Fork mounts are usually thought of as an Equatorial mount but it is also worth noting that it can also be used as an Alt-Az mount.

Fork Equatorial Mount

Fork Alt-Azimuth Mount

So what mount should you choose?

With the popularity of Go-To systems nowadays where you can simply punch in the name of the star, planet or DSO that you want to observe, choosing the right mount becomes almost trivial. But then, not all of us can still afford these Go-To systems. Furthermore, some of us would rather spend the extra money on another good eyepiece.

So, what would you choose? My suggestion are as follows…

Choose an Alt-Az mount if:
* You want a lighweight and affordable mount
* You want an easy to setup mount
* You just want to enjoy the night sky without all the technical hassles

Choose an EQ mount if:
* You want to view stuff at high magnification
* You need tracking of objects for a longer period of time
* You’re into astrophotography (R.A. motor needed)

Alt-Az mounts are generally good for beginners but as your interest in astronomy grows deeper, the EQ mount would most likely do better.

Clear skies to all!

Mike Lopez if a member of the Astronomical League of the Philippines and maintains a website on different topics at www.mikelopez.info. Mike Lopez also provides web hosting services at www.sydel.net.

» Follow me on Twitter

As each day goes by, Comet Pojmanski climbs higher and higher in the sky.  This day - February 28 - at 5:00am, Comet Pojmanski was already at about 15 degrees from the horizon making it easier to look at.

(more…)

Hi my dear readers. I wasn’t able to observe Comet Pojmanski yesterday (Feb 27) simply because I was so tired to wake up but here’s an excellent report and photo by a fellow amateur astronomer and ALP member Eric Africa. (more…)

Do you want to prevent your PC from being fried? One solution is to submerge it in cooking oil. Check out the video below from Tom’s Hardware.

(more…)

This is my second day of observing Comet Pojmanski and it’s February 26, 2006. If you haven’t read my first post yet, then feel free to read it here.

(more…)

Here’s my first observation of Comet Pojmanski.

Before anything else, thanks for fellow ALPer Jun Lao for posting in the Phil Astronomy Forum Yahoogroups that a new comet is visible. As soon as I saw his post, I got so excited that I immediately asked questions. I then went to Space.COM as I’m pretty sure that they are almost always updated of such events and as expected, I found rough coordinates of where to find the comet. According to the Space.COM article, Comet Pojmanski would be visible at roughly 7 degrees to the left and slightly below of Venus on February 27. It’s only February 25 so I have to look around the vicinity if I were to spot the comet.

(more…)

When we speak of satellites, we usually think of high-tech machines launched by human beings out into space.  We can also think of the International Space Station and more conservative people will immediately think of our very own moon when the word ’satellite’ is mentioned.  But here’s something new and unique.

(more…)

For years, the Turing Test was used to determine if a computer is intelligent or not. The Turing Test was described by Alan Turing in the 1950s and simply put, it states that “a human judge engages in a natural language conversation with two other parties, one a human and the other a machine; if the judge cannot reliably tell which is which, then the machine is said to pass the test.” So what is the Turing Test testing for? Since Alan Turing introduced in a seminal paper on the topic of Artificial Intelligence, then it is easy for me to say that the Turing Test was meant to test if a computer is intelligent. And this is where the flaw is.

(more…)

Recently, I’ve grown some interest on AI (Artificial Intelligence) programming especially those that have to do with text inputs and outputs only. In other words, chatbots. What I did was search the internet for chatbots and came across ALICE and Jabberwacky. Jabberwacky is the more complex and interesting one (to me) so I will talk about him here.

(more…)

It is pretty amazing to realize that a lot of modern technology were the brainchild of early science fiction writers. In fact, sci-fi stories are a good source of ideas for modern day inventors.

(more…)